vaken

Vakencorner




BottomBottom  Previous Topic Previous Topic  Next Topic Next Topic   Register To Post



Anonym
US State Dept put Mao Tse Tung in power
#1
M Stanton Evans discusses his research into Communist spies in the USA during the 1940s and 1950s. John Stewart Service of the US State Department backed Mao Tse-Tung's rise to power in China.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M70FWrfa3S8

Tax Exempt Foundations Hearings Reece Committee 1953.

"My fear of what the Ford -Foundation might be doing in India is increased by the fact that in the case of China the activities of the Rockefeller Foundation in that nation helped, instead of hindered, the advance of communism. The late gentleman
from Georgia, Mr. Cox, on August 1, 1951, made the following statement 9n this Chamber, with reference to the guilt of the Rockefeller Foundation for the triumph of the Communists in China
"The -Rockefeller Foundation, whose funds have been used to finance individuals and organizations whose business it has been to get communism into the private and public schools of the country, to talk down America and to play up Russia, must take its share of the blame for the swing of the professors and
students in China to communism during the years preceding the successful Red revolution in China. For two generations, the Rockefeller Foundation played a guiding role in higher education in China . Over a period of 32 years $45 million of Rockefeller money was expended in China, most of it going to Chinese institutions of higher learning . If the Rockefeller fund spenders had had even an elementary conception of what' was going on among the Chinese teachers and students, they would have taken steps to halt the stampede of the Chinese colleges to communism . When the crisis of the Chinese revolution came, it was the student and teacher element, educated largely with Rockefeller money, who were the backbone of the Red success. Our boys are now suffering and dying in Korea, in part, because Rockefeller money encouraged trends in the Chinese colleges and schools which swung China's intelligentsia to communism ."
inWthhaits hCahsa mhbaeprp esnheadr eo nmcye acnaxni ehtayp paesn taog atihne, fauntdu rIe aomf sIunrdei at haantd mwyh acto ltlheea gFuoersd Foundation is doing there-whether its activities are of such nature as to hamper India's orientation toward the Kremlin or to assist and augment it? In addition to the Rockefeller Foundation's activities in China, the Institute of
Pacific Relations, supported mainly by foundations, played a major part in the success of the Chinese Red revolution. The McCarran committee's extensive investigation of the Institute of Pacific Relations showed how this organization, financed primarily by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corp ., played
ttrhaen sKfroermmlaitni'ons ogfa mNea twiiotnha lirsetf eCrheinncae, toour Cahlilnya,, ianntdo Rheodw Cihtinam,a oduer peonsesmiyb,lewitthhe with otmo owke palracee eanfgtaegre dC hiinna ah abdl oboedeny swoalrd. ouTthitso itnhvee sKtriegmaltiinon. wBaust ahpoows tm umcohr tmeomr-e
useful it would be for a congressional committee to try to prevent by exposure any sort of activity, financed by the Ford Foundation, which may have a similar effect. in India as the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations' activities had in China."

Vet inte varför vissa ord blev konstiga när jag kopiera över men allt går att läsa i dokumentet.

Länkar till dokumentet:
http://rs110.rapidshare.com/files/260 ... ndations__1953_.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/26045411/ ... ndations__1953_.part2.rar


Quote:
Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations / Reece Committee

The following are some comments on the 1958 412-page Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A. Wormser, which was first published by the Devin-Adair Company of New York (Reprinted Covenant House Books, 1993):[1]
"In 1952, Congress commissioned the Cox Committee to investigate U.S. foundations. In 1953 it was the Reece Committee, and the author of this book was its general counsel. Wormser concedes that 'the emphasis on a search for organized Communist penetration of foundations absorbed much of the energy of the investigators and detracted somewhat from the efficacy of their general inquiry into subversion.' (page 177). He is more interested in an emerging elite that has control of gigantic financial resources: 'An unparalleled amount of power is concentrated increasingly in the hands of an interlocking and self-perpetuating group. Unlike the power of corporate management, it is unchecked by stockholders; unlike the power of government, it is unchecked by the people; unlike the power of churches, it is unchecked by any firmly established canons of value.' (page viii)[2]
"Forty years later, it's clear that Wormser's concerns over foundations were not misplaced; they still wield enormous political and cultural power. It's also clear that Congress should have worried more about the U.S. secret state than about Communism. The connections between intelligence elites, and the international programs funded by major foundations such as Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller, are quite amazing and deserve their own book."[3]
Another source addresses the "failure" of the Reece Committee to complete its task: "...Reece Committee hearings in the early 1950s. In this rather misunderstood episode, Congressman B. Carroll Reece (R., Tenn.), assisted by staff member René Wormser and consultant George de Huszar, looked into the grant-making policies of the Carnegie Corporation and the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. In the end, the effort ran aground on accusations of intellectual McCarthyism and the disruptive antics of Congressman Wayne Hays (D., Ohio). Nonetheless, 'the Committee shed light on the big foundations' promotion of empiricism, centralized team research, big universities over small colleges, moral relativism, internationalism, and social engineering. [See Tax-Exempt Foundations: Hearings, 83rd Congress, 2nd Session (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1954).][4]
More comments on the Reece Committee report:
"The interlocks between the trustees at RAND, and the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations were so numerous that the Reece Committee, a congressional committee tasked with investigating the foundations, listed them in its report (two each for Carnegie and Rockefeller, and three for Ford). In 1952 alone, when the chairman of the RAND Corporation was also the Ford Foundation president, Ford gave one million dollars to RAND."FN18
"Conspicuously absent from The Reece Committee report were the links between the Foundations to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In his book A THOUSAND DAYS(1965), CFR member Arthur Schlesinger, Jr, provides the link. Schlesinger writes 'the American Establishment,' whose 'household deities were Henry L. Stimson and Elihu Root; its present leaders [1965], Robert A. Lovett and John J. McCloy; its front organizations, the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations; its organs, the New York Times and Foreign Affairs....'"
Another source adds: "During the Eisenhower presidency (1953 - 1961), Congress established the Reece Committee to investigate tax-free foundations (Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie). The committee's report found:
"In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisors to government, and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote 'internationalism' in a particular sense - a form directed toward 'world government' and a derogation of American 'nationalism.'
"They observed that the major foundations 'have actively supported attacks upon our social and government system and financed the promotion of socialism and collectivist ideas.' The Reece Committee clearly declared that the CFR was 'in essence an agency of the United States Government' and that its 'productions are not objective but are directed overwhelmingly at promoting a globalist concept.'"

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tax-exempt_foundations

Interview with Norman Dodd, the 1954 staff director of the Reese congressional special committe
http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc ... 6HkBg&q=norman+dodd&hl=en

The Reece Committee: Social Science as a Tool for Control http://www.oldthinkernews.com/Article ... 0news/reece_committee.htm


Edited by Malmoesoldier on 2008/11/17 1:00:34
Edited by Malmoesoldier on 2008/11/17 1:06:39
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Anonym
Re: US State Dept put Mao Tse Tung in power
#2
Great pozt, malmo...!

 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 








dvd-infobeställning banner längst ned.
Ikoner
Paypal
Stötta Vaken med en månatlig donation
Facebook
Gå även med i vår facebook-grupp och bli en av de över 15 000 som diskuterar där.
Login
Annonsorer och reklam
Annonser:






Annonsorer och reklam 2


Creeper MediaCreeper
Vilka är Online
11 user(s) are online (11 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 11

more...
Nya medlemmar
test_user
test_user
01/01/2020
brifrida 09/05/2019
Turbozz 08/15/2019
Fr4nzz0n 07/30/2019
Egenerfarenhett 05/19/2019
Bloggar o Länkar

I11time.dk
911 Truth i Danmark.
Se verkligheten
Dissekerar skildringar från massmedia.
Den dolda agendan
Nyheter på svenska.
Klarsikt
Mats Sederholm & Linda Bjuvgård.
Dominic Johansson
Hjälp Dominic att komma hem.
Mjölkpallen
Mjölkpallen är samlingsplatsen där bonnförnuftet tros ha sitt säte.
911truth.no
911 Truth i Norge.
Nyhetsspeilet.no
Nyheter på norska.
En bild säger mer ...
Citat från eliten som bilder.
Folkvet
Sanningen är dold bland lögnerna
Fred & Frihet
Geoengineering.se
Hur påverkar geoengineering dig?
Grundläggande frihetsbegrepp på svenska

RSS