Vakencorner
Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tror ni att det kommer att skrivas nåt om detta i massmedia? Knappast, men jag ska skicka denna info till Susanna Baltscheffsky som arbetar på SVD's avdelning för klimathotspropaganda..
By John Coleman "It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create an illusion of rapid global warming." http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-bl ... nts_about_global_warming/ Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’ http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2007/091107Scam.htm
Posted on: 2007/11/9 18:53
|
|||
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
/Benjamin Franklin |
||||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quote:
Tack teba vi (jag ) drog i detta just nu i sällskap vi vannÖ:)
Posted on: 2007/11/9 19:07
|
|||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Strålande.
Lite mer från honom: http://www.kusi.com/weather/10682536.html Annan >>> COMMENTS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING By John Coleman The frenzy about global warming is wildly exaggerated. The constant hype borders on ridiculous. Global warming is about science; the science of meteorology. It is not an environmental issue or a political point of view. It is not something you "believe in". It is either a scientific fact or it isn't. And, after reading dozens of scientific papers on the topic I am absolutely convinced that there is no global warming crisis. I am a member of ICECAP.US, a website that posts materials that refute the global warming hype. We are not on the brink of meteorological Armageddon. The extremist, global warming advocates would have you believe that the end of the human friendly climate on planet Earth will grip the planet unless we take extreme action immediately. They say this runaway global warming is destined to end our prosperity, wipe out millions of lives, send property values plummeting, destroy our food supply, flood our coastal cities and as it produces an unstoppable sky rocket-like climb in temperatures. I must tell you the truth even though I know many of you have been so influenced by the constant barrage of climate change hype by the media you will not believe me. The climate change underway is not extreme nor runaway. The average temperature of planet Earth may have increased as much as 1 degree in the last hundred years. There have been many periods in Earth's history of much greater change and much warmer temperatures. This is not the beginning of a civilization threatening, out-of- control change to unlivable conditions, polar ice cap melt and coastal flooding. This is no imminent weather disaster. Here is my latest report on Global Warming: THE DUBIOUS DATA BEHIND THE GLOBAL WARMING FRENZY By John Coleman using information and excerpts from a report by John McLean The basic scientific documents behind the clamor about "global Warming" are the product of an organization known as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It was formed in 1998 by the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization. Every member nation of the UN can place members on the panel. It is a huge and unwieldy organization of mostly government officials from nations large and small, modern and third worldly, rich and poor. Its members bring a wide range of political and environmental agendas to the group. What scientists there are on the panel are relegated to support positions. This is not a scientific organization, not by a long shot. In February of this year, the IPPC issued its Fourth Assessment Report on Global Warming. This document claimed that there was a 90% to 95% probability that man-made emissions of carbon dioxide are having a significant influence on climate. This claim was widely accepted by the news media, politicians, government officials and the public. Many governments made both political and financial commitments on the basis of its statements. But did anybody who really understands the science of meteorology actually read the report in detail and check the evidence on which the claim was made before accepting it and joining the international clamor to reduce CO2 ? The answer is no. At the time this would have been extremely difficult because the Summary for Policy Makers was released in February and the working groups supporting document was not released until May. And that Summary gave no supporting evidence at all. When the working group report was finally released in May, anyone who reviewed the principal finding, that mankind was responsible for the increase in temperature, should have been appalled by the absence of concrete evidence. The IPCC's claim is detailed in section 6.7 of the Working Group I report and rests on four pillars: The world is warming and the temperature increase is widespread The temperature increase cannot be explained by internal variability or heat moving from one climate component to another The distribution of warming is not consistent with models Climate models need to include an anthropogenic component in order for the output to match the observed surface temperatures, The so-called evidence is a nothing more than hodge-podge of dubious assertions and false assumptions, and if these are the best arguments that the IPCC could advance then the IPCC's future , not the future of our climate should be reconsidered. Here is a brief look a few of the reports short comings. The IPCC claims that global average surface temperatures have increased in relatively consistent fashion since the mid 1970s. This is based on the data reported by 3 agencies, Britain's Climatic Research Unit and the two US agencies, The Goddard Institute for Space Studies and United States Historical Climate Network run by the National Weather Service Climate Data Center. Recent investigations in the US have indicated that an estimated 25% of weather observations stations in this county are poorly located to collect reliable data. Many have been numerous times in the last 150 years. Some are now too close to buildings, paved roadways, discharges from air-conditioning units, etc. Whether there are similar problems in the other nations is not really known. Before we accept this data further investigations seems warranted. Another problem is the "urban heat island" effect caused by the heat generated by cities that greatly elevates temperatures there as compared to readings in adjacent rural areas. This distorts the local temperature record. Britain's CRU claims that it does not know which observation stations supplied the data used in its monthly and annual calculations, but it does report that the data coverage of the Earth's surface varies each month. This variable number of unknown weather stations makes it impossible to properly audit the quality of the data. None of the three agencies has allowed an independent audit of its data and methods. Even if the widespread warming is not entirely due to data corruption by man-made changes to the environment there is no good reason to automatically associate it with man-made emissions of carbon dioxide as the IPCC has done. The IPCC claims that "internal variability" cannot account for the supposed temperature increase but this is a suspicious statement because climate scientists often use the term "internal variability" for situations that are poorly understood, and the IPCC admits to plenty of those. One example of this is the description of El Niño conditions as an "internal variable". The exact process that causes an El Niño to form is not known nor are the determinants of its strength. Certain aspects of El Niño events have been shown to correlate with solar emissions and activities suggesting that this "internal variable" may have a substantial "external" component. The report continues to ramble through issues relative to cloud cover, albedo changes, climate modeling, El Ninos etc. Through it all, it fails to deal with the basic need to prove a significant increase in temperatures, a connection between warming and carbon dioxide, and connection of these with any glacier melt that may be occurring. Not one sentence in this report is supported by any incontrovertible evidence. The IPCC acknowledges that climate factors are poorly understood but conveniently forgets this when making assertions about understanding, estimating and modeling. Even then a "net positive forcing" is not irrefutable evidence of a human influence but only that heat from some source has been added to the climate system, assuming of course that the temperature data is accurate. Three of the IPCC's four pillars of evidence rest on uncertain temperature and climate models that are based on incomplete knowledge. The fourth, that the temperature increase cannot be explained by internal variability or heat moving from one climate component to another, assumes that the temperature data is correct and that factors described as "internal variables" are well understood. The IPCC's claim of a 90% to 95% probability of human influence is more than just wishful thinking; it is selective bias that ignores the uncertainty of the data and the low level of climate knowledge on which the claim rests. Given the doubts over the quality of the temperature record we cannot be sure that the IPCC has even proven any recent increase in temperatures let alone produced any credible evidence that humans are having a substantial impact on temperature. End of my report. The media, always looking for gloom and doom and the sky-is-falling headlines, accepted the IPCC report without study or investigation and turned into a continuing onslaught of panicky news coverage about the dire consequences of Global Warming. Voila. We have a world wide panic about climate change. It is a myth and sheer folly. ___________________________________________________________________ The Canadian Broadcasting Company's Cable News Network produced an excellent documentary on Global Warming. It is titled " Doomsday Called Off ". Here are the Youtube URLs to watch it in five parts: Part 1 http:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA Part 2: http:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD6VBLlWmCI Part 3: http:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZS2eIRkcR0 Part 4: http:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIbTJ6mhCqk Part 5: http:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2XALmrq3ro Some people may want to see the research behind my dismissive attitude about Global Warming. If you want to wade through scientific jargon, here are some relevant websites. Http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/WegmanReport.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/NRCreport.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/NAS.M&M.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/MM03.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/Climate_L.pdf http:/www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/MM-W05-background.pdf Story Created: Oct 19, 2007 at 6:08 PM PST Story Updated: Oct 19, 2007 at 9:27 PM PST
Posted on: 2007/11/9 20:23
|
|||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nu har jag mejlat Susanna på SVD's avdelning för klimathotspropagandan denna info om John Coleman, då mitt inlägg på hennes blogg är försvunnet??
Posted on: 2007/11/10 18:03
Edited by TeBe on 2007/11/10 18:30:32
|
|||
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
/Benjamin Franklin |
||||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yo the king bee TeBe,
just goes to show right Sting it then
Posted on: 2007/11/10 18:09
|
|||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Angående klimathotet, om det nu är en "scam". Varför är inte bushen mera intresserad av ämnet? Varför vill i så fall USA med Bush i spetsen stå utanför kyoto protokoll mm?
Jag får det inte riktigt att gå ihop... Personligen tror jag ändå att den globala uppvärmingen är helt naturlig. Men det skadar inte att vara miljövänlig. I normala proportioner.
Posted on: 2007/11/10 20:20
|
|||
|
Anonym
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
För att Bush spelar rollen som "bad guy" i NWO-teatern nu. Han behöver inte vinna några röster.. Al Gore, som ju EGENTLIGEN slog Bush i valet framstår nu som en riddare i skinande rustning..
Är man MOT Bush (vilket de flesta är idag, utom de allra mest cyniska) så är man MED Gore.. Svart eller vitt, höger eller vänster, klassisk NWO-programmering. |
||||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
raybeam:
Al gore fick fler röster, svar ja. Men om han nu är så ond. Varför gick det inte lika bra då att han fick vinna valet enligt "NWO-teatern"? I stället blev det flippel med röstningen i florida. Tror ändå att demokraterna är bättre än republikanerna. Demokraterna hänger ju inte på bohemian grove i alla fall...
Posted on: 2007/11/10 20:52
|
|||
|
Anonym
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cactus: Så det är bara republikaner som är med i olika ordersällskap och liknande? Bohemian grove är inte viktigt alls, det är bara ett spel det också, annars hade vi aldrig kännt till det tror jag. Lite fest och manliga prostituerade. Viktiga planer för världen är redan murade sedan långt tidigt, BG är inget viktigt möte / thinktank.
Gore skulle aldrig vinna valet, har det aldrig slagit dig? Han var bara slagpåse och talade alltid om "hur hemskt det vore om bush vann" i sina turnéer, istället för att framhäva varför han skulle vara president. The bigboys har olika jobb i toppen och olika syften. Ibland spelar de mot varandra i olika politiska spel, ibland jobbar de med varandra. Svårare än så är det inte. Tragedy and hope av Quigley ger dig mer kunskap om detta ämne, den finns som pdf här på vaken. Varsågod! |
||||
|
Anonym
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Big Boys
Boktipset Allan Watts eko har talat |
||||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quote:
Du menar Alan Watt. Alan Watts var en annan mycket känd person: http://www.alanwatts.com/ Så finns Lyall Watson, med det där som inte var sant... Den hundrade apan en avslöjad myt http://www.sokaren.se/INDEX119.HTML
Posted on: 2007/11/10 21:28
|
|||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
void:
Var och varannan människa är med i någon form av sällskap. Det finns druider o allt möjligt. Al gore är säkert med i något också. Problemet blir i stället när högt uppsatta är med i typ grupper som bilderberggruppen. Internationellt utbyte måste vara offentliga. Vilket det inte är idag. Senatorer (usa) som är med på bilderberggruppens möten, bryter väl mot lagen? Vet inte om Reinfeldt gör det? Får sveriges statsminister ha henliga möten med främmande makt? Det låter inte troligt. Är det någon som kan lagboken? Hur som helst, om allt är planerat så långt tillbaka i tiden. Vill inte dom gamla stofilerna se sin plan gå i lås? Vad är det för mening att dö pga av ålder utan att se sin plan på att ta över planeten färdigställas? Tycker att dom arbetar i snigeltempo (fram till 9/11) Sedan borde alla höjdare som är insyltade få en egen OSCAR. Maken till bra skådespelare har man aldrig sätt i så fall. Om Gore aldrig skulle vunnit valet, varför gick han då ut så hårt? Det hade väl varit bättre för NWO om Bush hade vunnit större? Detta blev lite rörigt, men tack för lästips.
Posted on: 2007/11/10 21:42
|
|||
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quote:
Det går säkert i det tempo som är meningen. Det är styrt från "ovan". Kanske dags att läsa vad Insider skrev... http://www.filecentral.se/filecentral ... a7-435d-a98f-3d6f28c94a53
Posted on: 2007/11/11 0:04
|
|||
|
Anonym
|
Re: Nu går t.o.m Weather Channel-grundaren ut och dissar klimathotet!!
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Japp. Det är en jävla skillnad på Alan Watt och Alan Watts. För mig är mycket roligt eftersom jag följde/läste/lyssnade/studerade alan watts material massor för 5-7 år sedan. Gillar hans defintioner av verkligheten och hur vi använder våra sinnen till att processa inkommande data väldigt mycket än idag. Andra läst watts?
Maggot: Så du känner till begreppet big-boys? Vilka ord brukar du beskriva den odefinerade eliten med? Kom igen, ge mig dina bästa utan att skämta/larva dig. För ditt ordförråd är väl lite större än bara att hosta ur dig ditt karaktäristiska: "judarna"/"Zionisterna" så fort du vill dissa "eliten". Men med tanke på din mentala låsning kring det de senaste 6 månaderna så är det väl ganska förvånande om du lyckas hitta ett passande adjektiv kanske? Någon som vill ta ämnet tillbaka till topic? Cus I fukked up med det iaf. PS - Cactus, har en bra grej till dig om delar av det där pm:ar/och svarar sen.
Edited by void on 2007/11/11 4:22:10
Edited by void on 2007/11/11 4:49:29 |
||||
|
Paypal
Facebook
Gå även med i vår facebook-grupp och bli en av de över 15 000 som diskuterar där.
Login
Vilka är Online
Nya medlemmar
test_user |
01/01/2020 |
brifrida | 09/05/2019 |
Turbozz | 08/15/2019 |
Fr4nzz0n | 07/30/2019 |
Egenerfarenhett | 05/19/2019 |
Bloggar o Länkar
I11time.dk
911 Truth i Danmark.
Se verkligheten
Dissekerar skildringar från massmedia.
Den dolda agendan
Nyheter på svenska.
Klarsikt
Mats Sederholm & Linda Bjuvgård.
Dominic Johansson
Hjälp Dominic att komma hem.
Mjölkpallen
Mjölkpallen är samlingsplatsen där bonnförnuftet tros ha sitt säte.
911truth.no
911 Truth i Norge.
Nyhetsspeilet.no
Nyheter på norska.
En bild säger mer ...
Citat från eliten som bilder.
Folkvet
Sanningen är dold bland lögnerna
Fred & Frihet
Geoengineering.se
Hur påverkar geoengineering dig?
Grundläggande frihetsbegrepp på svenska