Gjorde en liten(?) analys om ideerna och kopplingarna mellan Zeitgeist Addendum, Venus Project, Jacque Fresco och World Future Society m.fl...

Zeitgeist Addendum deklarerar:

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/statement.htm

"The work advocates a new social system which is updated to present day knowledge, highly influenced by the life long work of Jacque Fresco and The Venus Project."

Jacque Fresco och The Venus Project/Future By Design står för:

http://www.futurebydesign.org/mission.html

Mission:

"Future by Design presents a bold, new direction for humanity that entails nothing less than the total redesign of our culture. There are many people today who are concerned with the serious problems that face our modern society: unemployment, violent crime, replacement of humans by technology, over-population and a decline in the Earth's ecosystems. As you will see, Future by Design is dedicated to confronting all of these problems by actively engaging in the research, development, and application of workable solutions. Through the use of innovative approaches to social awareness, educational incentives, and the consistent application of the best that science and technology can offer directly to the social system, Future by Design offers a comprehensive plan for social reclamation in which human beings, technology, and nature will be able to coexist in a long-term, sustainable state of dynamic equilibrium."

About us:

http://www.futurebydesign.org/about.html

This is why Future By Design advocates the transition from a monetary-based society to the eventual realization of a resource-based global economy.

One of the basic premises of Future By Design is that we work towards having all of the Earth's resources as the common heritage of all the world's people.

Jag gjorde en enkel sökning på uttrycket "resource-based global economy" och hittade en avhandling/bok(?) vid namn:

"Natural Resource-Based Economic Development in History":

http://www.world-economics-journal.co ... ticleOverview.aspx?ID=218

"World Economics is a quarterly journal that brings you unprecedented access to the best current thinking in economics and its practical application to business, investment and policy making."

Who will benefit most from the journal?

"World Economics is essential reading for government and corporate economists, politicians and their research staff, civil servants, labour leaders and senior business people. It supplies vital analysis for central banks, investment banks and other financial institutions, and for major corporations and regulatory institutions. It provides crucial briefing for members of think-tanks, government ministries and intergovernmental agencies.

http://www.world-economics-journal.co ... /AboutWorldEconomics.aspx

International Advisory Board:

http://www.world-economics-journal.co ... ation/EditorialBoard.aspx

Charles Bean
Bank of England

Alan Blinder
Princeton University

Andrew Crockett
JP Morgan Chase International

Mervyn King
The Bank of England

Allan H. Meltzer
Carnegie Mellon University

Lite mer information från FN om "resource-based-economy"..

"The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) was set up in 1947 by ECOSOC. It is one of five regional commissions of the United Nations."

http://www.unece.org/ead/sem/sem2005/papers/Ahrend.pdf

"The first part of this paper discusses in detail the policies that are required for successfully developing a resource-based economy."

"Given the importance of ensuring fiscal balance across the commodity-price cycle, the creation of a stabilisation fund is generally a very important issue. Such a stabilisation fund accumulates windfall government revenues. These revenues would ideally be managed by an entity that has no authority to
spend the money (that is an independent special institution or the central bank, but not the government, the ministry of finance, or any other ministry)."

...it might be desirable to earmark a certain portion of price-independent resource taxes to make up these losses"

Så.... Vad betyder "resource-based-global-economy"
Översatt så blir det resursbaserad ekonomi och vad kan detta betyda?

Eftersom dom diskuterar resursskatt i den avhandligen från FN ( UNECE ) så torde detta mer eller mindre betyda skatt på bland annat vatten..

Mer information om World Future Society:

Forecasts for the Next 25 Years
http://www.wfs.org/tomorrow/index.htm

Forecast #3: The threat of another cold war with China, Russia, or both could replace terrorism as the chief foreign-policy concern of the United States.

Forecast #4: Counterfeiting of currency will proliferate, driving the move toward a cashless society.

Forecast #6: Water will be in the twenty-first century what oil was in the twentieth century.

Forecast #10: More decisions will be made by nonhuman entities.

"Complete medical diagnostics on a single computer chip."

Ett axplock av deras medlemmar:

http://www.wfs.org/faq.htm

Sandra L. Postel, director, Global Water Policy Project
http://www.globalwaterpolicy.org/

"The Global Water Policy Project, based in western Massachusetts, aims to promote the preservation and sustainable use of Earth’s fresh water through research, writing, outreach, and public speaking.

Barbara Marx Hubbard, president, The Foundation for Conscious Evolution
http://www.evolve.org/pub/doc/footer_about_fce.html

"The Foundation for Conscious Evolution is helping to build a new path—a “golden bridge”—to the next stage of human evolution."

" The ultimate goal of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution is the awakening of the spiritual, social, and scientific potential of humanity, in harmony with nature for the highest good of all life."

Robert S. McNamara, former president, World Bank; former U.S. Secretary of Defense

Maurice F. Strong, secretary general, U.N. Conference on Environment and Development

John L. Petersen, president, The Arlington Institute
http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org/tai/history

John L. Petersen brought his staff together and they developed a set of basic issues that they felt would be the main contributors and shapers of the future in the coming decade –

* the global have/have-not situation,
* wars over drinking water,
* rapid climate change,
* fundamental computer-influenced changes happening to major human institutions (government, education, military, religion),
* nanotechnology,
* biological terrorism,
* rapid disintegration or positive change in Africa’s future,
* genetic modification and biotechnology,
* augmented intelligence – where humans were merging with computers and computers were taking on the capabilities of humans,
* a global epidemic, and
* discovery of extraterrestrial life.

Joergen Oerstroem Moeller, visiting senior research fellow, ISEAS, Singapore
http://www.iseas.edu.sg/

Dessa har ett seminarium som avhandlar ämnet:

“Pricing” the Environment: Case Studies on Climate Change and Turtle Conservation
http://www.iseas.edu.sg/iframes/29oct08.htm



The Futurist är WFS's egna magasin/tidning:

THE FUTURIST includes:

http://www.wfs.org/tomorrow/index.htm

Peter F. Drucker — business visionary
B.F. Skinner — psychologist
Ray Kurzweil — inventor
Harvey Cox — theologian
Amitai Etzioni — sociologist
Glenn Seaborg — Nobel Prize-winning chemist
Margaret Mead — anthropologist
Gene Roddenberry — Star Trek creator
John Challenger — employment expert
Hazel Henderson — economist
Anthony Fauci — NIH AIDS expert
Nicholas Negroponte — new media visionary
Richard Lamm — former Colorado Governor
Kofi Annan — U.N. Secretary General
Herman Kahn — defense analyst
Fritjof Capra — physicist
Alvin and Heidi Toffler — authors
Julian Simon — economist
Carl Sagan — astronomer
Neil de Grasse Tyson — astronomer
Frederik Pohl — science fiction writer
E.F. Schumacher — economist
John Naisbitt — author
Harold Shane — educator
Daniel Yankelovich — public opinion expert
Gerard K. O'Neill — space exploration expert
Vaclav Havel — statesman
Marvin Cetron — forecaster
Sir John Templeton — famed investor
David Walker — U.S. Comptroller General

Speakers at WFS conferences have included:

Al Gore — Vice President
Newt Gingrich — House Speaker
Gerald Ford — President
Walter Mondale — Vice President
Sir Arthur C. Clarke — author
Buckminster Fuller — visionary designer
Gene Roddenberry — Star Trek creator
Betty Friedan — author
Fritjof Capra — physicist
Isaac Asimov — writer
Alvin Toffler — futurist
Marilyn Ferguson — visionary
Les Aspin — Senator
Hazel Henderson — economist
Lester Brown — environmentalist
Hubert H. Humphrey — Vice President
Marshall McLuhan — media guru
B.F. Skinner — psychologist
Margaret Mead — anthropologist
Timothy Leary — psychologist
Jay Rockefeller — Senator
Doug Casey — investment author
Ray Kurzweil — inventor
John Naisbitt — author
Glenn Seaborg — Nobel Prize-winning chemist
Ellen Burstyn — actress
Herman Kahn — defense analyst

Hur länge ska jag fortsätta med denna kartläggning? Finns hur mycket som helst..

O igen... Du försöker se sammanhang som inte finns. "Jag sökte på begreppet" o så finns det ett sammanband, "var tydligen en bästsäljare på..." o så finns det ett samband. Sådana sammanband finns mellan alla.
Men du som är så inne på internetforskning, kan inte du mejla World Economist o fråga vad de tycker om att det monetära systemets försvinnande o ett gemensamt ägande av alla resurser? Kan inte du fråga dem vad de tror deras läsare känner inför att bli av med sin ekonomiska makt? Det kommer du inte göra för det skulle ju visa att dina "samband" är antingen semantiska eller resultatet av kreativt googlande.

Vet du vad Despertando, svälj Zeitgeists budskap med hull och hår och sug i dig av socialismen/kollektivismen med ett system uppbyggt på resursbaserade krediter, när du sen har använt din tilldelade mängd med vatten så kan du ju gå törstig.. Vem vet du kanske kan meditera lite, så törsten försvinner..

Vet du vad detta betyder för allas levnadsstandard?

Inser du inte att Zeitgeist budskap tillsammans med Jacque Fresco och WFS's ideer går hand i hand med maktelitens rasbiologiska agenda????

Man kan också välja att inte göra någonting alls förutom lyssna på talkshow-värdar, posta en länk till klippet på ett forum och diskutera i oändlighet hur ruttet systemet är - även om man tänker försvara det till sin död om det behövs.

Jag kan bara inte låta bli:

The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

Referens är överflödig

Jag vet vad det kapitalistiska "detta äger jag"systemet innebär för de 2 000 000 000 människor som lever på $2 om dagen. Mer av samma kommer inte innebära att de får det bättre.

Jag vet vad sanning är. Sanningen är t ex att jag har gott om kritiska åsikter om Zeitgeist. Men tråden handlar inte om det. Den handlar om din analys av filmen. Den analysen är sopigt gjord, precis som dina tidigare försök. Om du var ärlig skulle du kritisera filmen för dess innehåll o gärna komma med bättre lösningar. Det gör du inte, du väljer ett mycket kreativt googlande istället.

Vet du vad jag tror är skälet? Du gör det av samma anledning en del andra slingrar sig som ormar när man frågar dem saker. Du vill inte röja dina egna uppfattningars svagheter. Så du skiter på andras idéer, åsikter o uppfattningar. Jag har bara skönjt dina åsikter men jag satsar mina pengar på att om du fritt uttryckte din syn på framtiden, på hur samhället ska vara, ditt utopia så skulle det låta som Alex Jones. Vapen, fri företagsamhet, minimala samhälleliga kontrollorgan... Eller har jag fel? Skapa gärna en tråd om saken. Jag försökte men det kom två seriösa inlägg(tack Seilon o micro!) sen dog den. För ingen vill prata lösningar, framtid eller det ansvarstagande som kommer med dessa koncept. Man vill bara sprida mer skräck, rädsla o misstänksamhet. Till varje pris.

allt är sammankopplat, man kan välja att se det negativa i det eller det positiva. akta er för att vilja för mycket. Konkret bevisning och ett öppet sinne samt logiskt tänkande krävs i detta här och nu.

Alltså, jag dissar ingen, utan påpekar bara att det finns positivt i det negativa och negativt i det positiva.

Desperanto läs dessa tre böcker. Dom kommer få dig att förstå varför dom lever på $2 om dan.

http://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Eco ... ohn-Perkins/dp/1576753018

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-History- ... 89572/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b

http://www.amazon.com/Game-Old-Empire ... B001E96GZO/ref=pd_sim_b_2

den sista räcker det egentligen med att läsa.