Mycket bra serie med Adyashanti på 6 CDS.
Han har varit lärling hos zenmästare i 15 år innan han vaknade upp och nu lär han ut själv om andlighet och upplysningen.

Adyashanti’s nondual teachings have been compared to those of the early Zen masters and Advaita Vedanta sages. Expressing both the infinite possibilities and the ordinary simplicity of a spiritually realized life, Adyashanti’s teachings are directed to those who are sincerely called to awaken to their true nature and embody this life-changing realization.

"If you filter my words through any tradition or '-ism', you will miss altogether what I am saying. The liberating truth is not static; it is alive. It cannot be put into concepts and be understood by the mind. The truth lies beyond all forms of conceptual fundamentalism. What you are is the beyond—awake and present, here and now already. I am simply helping you to realize that."

BitTorrent download:
http://cache.torrentspy.com/download.asp?id=787248

Quote:

Jaha, nu är det detta som ska in i ryggsäcken...
Det finns inget att hämta i sådant där... de kan inte rädda människor, förstå vår tid, det är bara låga väsen och besättande saker i dessa traditioner - det är så till 100% under sluttampen -, mm...

Man kan inte återfå vad man förlorat utan att kultivera sig, varför skulle man annars ha förlorat det... förstår du vad devolution är - förstår du vad som kommer in i människor som håller på med metoder, terapier, kanalisering... inga vägar finns kvar som vägar, utan det som mkommer in är besättande saker. Det är ingen vanlig cykel somär slut, utan hela kosmos genomgår något- människor håller på med qi-grejer - men gong har det inte, det fås via kultivering (Mästaren omvandlar, se Zhuan Falun) - det hette inte qi gong förr, utan hade ett annat ord, men är med våra ord just ordet kultivering. Sedan kom vackra fina namn på kultiveringsvägar, som kunde ha namn på paradis man räddades till. Det kunde inte vara kvar under kulturrevolutionen. Då sattes två ord ihop qi och gong - men det som det var förr var kultivering, som kunde ha övningar också för att omvandla/höja kroppen. Nu så blev det bara något för att stärka hälsan och må bra... men det var inte alls vad qigong var förr - hälsan fickman då på köpet.

Så nu i allt sökeri, newageismen, tempelmiljöer osv, så är det bara demoniska saker osv som finns där. "Människor" tror att de har förmågor, har fått något, kan bota sjukdomar... kan se... osv - men det är inte så det ligger till alls... det är annat som återspeglar det hos "människan", besättelse. De har inte utvecklat gong - det är det som kan ses på gamla avbildningar som en energipelare som sträcker sig ovanför huvudet på en Mästare, eller en som mediterar etc. Det är personens nivå (ungefär), detta är bara mina bristfälliga ord och förståelse, se Zhuan Falun för fakta.

"Människor" håller på att förstöra sig själva och andra, alla stör varandra hit och dit, med smutsig sjuk qi... de tror att de har förmågor mm - men det är annat bakom ryggen som "ger det".

Zen är strunt.

Se http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtop ... t_id=38278#forumpost38278

The Lord of Buddhas, whose mercy is incredibly immense, has left the Buddha Fa to human beings. The universe is giving humans another opportunity, allowing the mighty Buddha Fa once again to reveal the universe’s actual reality to the human world, to wash away all filth and ignorance, and to use human language to recapture its brilliance and splendor. May you cherish it! The Buddha Fa is right in front of you.

Li Hongzhi
September 28, 1996
http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtop ... t_id=38298#forumpost38298


Sök på Zen i kapitel 1 Zhuan Falun http://www.falundafa.org/book/eng/lecture1.html



Fria viljan Calleman/Lungold...

http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtop ... t_id=30099#forumpost30099
http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtop ... t_id=25485#forumpost25485


Ur Zhuan Falun:

We have said that no matter how much human moral values have changed, this characteristic of the universe, Zhen-Shan-Ren, will forever remain unchanged. If someone says that you are good, you may not really be good. If someone says that you are bad, you may not really be bad. This is because the criteria that evaluate good and bad are distorted. Only one who complies with this characteristic of the universe is a good person. It is the sole criterion which determines a good or bad person, and it is recognized by the universe. Although great changes have taken place in human society, human moral values have declined tremendously. Human morality is deteriorating daily, and profits have become the sole motivation. Yet changes in the universe do not occur according to changes in humankind. As a practitioner, one cannot conduct oneself based on the standard of everyday people. It is not permitted if you go do things simply because everyday people consider them right. When everyday people say that it is good, it may not be good. When everyday people say that it is bad, it may not be bad, either. In this time when the moral values are distorted, if you tell someone that he is doing something bad, he will not believe it! As a practitioner, one must assess things with the characteristic of the universe. Only then can one distinguish what is genuinely good and what is truly bad.

----------

Enlightenment

In the muddy human world, pearls and fish eyes are jumbled together. A Tathagata must descend to the world quietly. When he teaches the Fa, evil practices are bound to interfere. The Dao and the demonic ways are taught at the same time and in the same world. Amidst truth and falsehood, enlightening is important. How to distinguish them? There are bound to be exceptional people. Those who really have a predestined relationship and can enlighten will come one after another, entering the Dao and obtaining the Fa. They will distinguish the righteous from the evil, obtain true teachings, lighten their bodies, enhance their wisdom, enrich their hearts, and board the boat of the Fa, sailing smoothly. How wonderful! Strive forward with every effort until Consummation.

Those who survive the world without direction and with poor enlightenment quality live for money and die for power, being joyful or anxious over petty gains. They compete bitterly against each other, thus accruing karma throughout their lives. When such people hear the Fa, they laugh at it and spit from their mouths the word “superstition,” as they are bound to find it hard to understand and hard to believe deep down inside. These people are the inferior persons who are difficult to save. Their karma is so much that it has enveloped their bodies and sealed off their wisdom; their original nature is gone.

Li Hongzhi
June 14, 1995

------

Något om Zen Buddhism:

http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtop ... t_id=31279#forumpost31279
Jodå. Men det enda som kan bli gott det är en själv. Det utanför en själv är en verkan, ett resultat av vad man har förfallit till själv. Det finns bara en själv som man kan förändra. Det har inget med andras etiketter såsom inom new age att göra. Som att det är "egoistiskt". Det finns inget sådant som att "prestera godhet" - universum är till sin natur god, och vi ska kultivera tillbaka till universums kriterier, om vi vill komma vidare - zen är ju bara kultivering. Men det var Sakyamuni som Bodhidharma följde egentligen, men han gjorde en egen väg - funkade den... hade han en egen hög nivå att leda/rädda lärjungarna till, ett eget paradis...?

Zen har aldrig varit något bra. De har missat, tolkat fel om saker som Sakyamuni sa. Tex så sa han ju att han har aldrig lärt ut någon dharma i hela sitt liv - han menade att det han lärt ut tidigare var på en viss nivå, men att det var inte den yttersta sanningen - han upptäckte detta hela tiden då han själv steg uppåt i nivå, under de 49 år som han ökade sin nivå. Zen har tolkat det som att det finns ingen dharma att lära ut... och att man måste förstå allt själv... därför har de den där käppvarningen, så man ska upplysas till en insikt när man mediterar.
Man kan läsa Zhuan Falun, det står däri hur det var kring det.

Han är inte fast i någon form snarare tvärtom. zen var bara hans väg att nå dit.

"If you filter my words through any tradition or '-ism', you will miss altogether what I am saying."

Quote:

Nå vart menar du? "Fast i en form..." - det är han alltså inte. Det säger ju att han inte har en Väg. Det är ju skrämmande... - det som det är är att han har ingen Väg uppåt att kultivera sig igenom/med - han har ingen Mästare, för det finns inte inom Zen...

Här står om Zen, jag gav länk innan, men det läsesväl inte, i vilket fall så har vad det verkar nada förståtts - läs hela Zhuan Falun - jag ger här ett utdrag, vilket jag egentligen tycker inte alltid är så bra

Från kapitel1 (http://www.falundafa.org/book/eng/lecture1.html), om Zen från stycke 2:

Genuinely teaching a cultivation system requires teaching the Fa or the Tao. In ten lectures I will make known all of the high-level principles so that you can practice cultivation. Otherwise, you cannot practice cultivation at all. All of what others have taught are things at the level of healing and fitness. If you want to practice cultivation toward high levels, you will not succeed in cultivation without the guidance of the high-level Fa. It resembles attending school: If you go to college with elementary school textbooks, you will still be an elementary school pupil. Some people think that they have learned many practices, such as this practice or that practice, and they have a pile of graduation certificates, but their gong still has not made any progress. They think that those are the true essence of qigong and what qigong is all about. No, they are only a skin-deep part of qigong and something at the lowest level. Qigong is not confined to these things, as it is cultivation practice as well as something very broad and profound. In addition, different Fa exist at different levels. Thus, it is different from those practices of qi that we know at present; it will be the same no matter how much more you learn. For instance, although you have studied British elementary school textbooks, American elementary school textbooks, Japanese elementary school textbooks, and Chinese elementary school textbooks, you remain an elementary school pupil. The more low-level qigong lessons you have taken and the more from them you have absorbed, the more harm you will incur—your body is already messed up.

I must emphasize yet another issue: Our cultivation practice requires teaching both a cultivation method and Fa. Some monks in temples, especially those of Zen Buddhism, may have different opinions. As soon as they learn about the teaching of Fa, they will be unwilling to hear it. Why is it? Zen Buddhism believes that Fa should not be taught, that Fa is not Fa if it is taught, and that there is no teachable Fa; one can only understand something via heart and soul. As a result, to this day Zen Buddhism has not been able to teach any Fa. Patriarch Boddhidarma of Zen Buddhism taught such things based upon a statement made by Sakyamuni8 who said: "No Dharma9 is definitive." He founded Zen Buddhism based on this statement by Sakyamuni. We consider this cultivation way to be "digging into a bull’s horn."10 Why is it said to dig into a bull’s horn? When Boddhidarma began to dig into it, he felt that it was quite spacious. When Patriarch II dug into it, he felt that it was not very spacious. It was still passable by the time of Patriarch III, but for Patriarch IV it was already quite narrow. There was almost no room to move further for Patriarch V. By the time of Huineng, Patriarch VI, it had reached a dead end and could move no further. If today you visit a Zen Buddhist to study Dharma, you should not ask any questions. If you ask a question, he or she will turn around and whack your head with a stick, which is called a "stick warning." It means that you should not inquire, and you should become enlightened on your own. You would say, "I came to study because I don’t know anything. What should I become enlightened about? Why do you hit me with a stick?!" This indicates that Zen Buddhism has reached the dead end of the bull’s horn, and there is no longer anything to teach. Even Boddhidarma stated that his teaching could be passed down to only six generations, after which it would no longer serve any use. Several hundred years have passed. Yet there are people today who still hold firmly to the doctrines of Zen Buddhism. What’s the actual meaning of Sakyamuni’s pronouncement, "No Dharma is definitive"? Sakyamuni’s level was Tathagata.11 Many monks later on were not enlightened at Sakyamuni’s level, to the thinking in his realm of thought, to the real meaning of his professed Dharma, or to the actual meaning of what he said. Therefore, people later on interpreted it this way or that way with very confusing interpretations. They thought that "No Dharma is definitive" meant that one should not teach it, and it would not be Dharma if taught. Actually, that is not what it means. When Sakyamuni became enlightened under a Bodhi tree, he did not reach the Tathagata level right away. He was also constantly improving himself during the forty-nine years of his Dharma teaching. Whenever he upgraded himself to a higher level, he looked back and realized that the Dharma he just taught was all wrong. When he made progress again, he discovered that the Dharma he just taught was wrong again. After he made further progress, he realized again that the Dharma he just taught was wrong. He constantly made such progress during his entire forty-nine years. Whenever he reached a higher level, he would discover that the Dharma he taught in the past was at a very low level in its understanding. He also discovered that the Dharma at each level is always the manifestation of the Dharma at that level, that there is Dharma at every level, and that none of them is the absolute truth of the universe. The Dharma at high levels is closer to the characteristic of the universe than that of lower levels. Therefore, he stated: "No Dharma is definitive."

In the end, Sakyamuni also proclaimed, "I haven’t taught any Dharma in my lifetime." Zen Buddhism again misunderstood this as meaning there was no Dharma to be taught. By his later years, Sakyamuni had already reached the Tathagata level. Why did he say that he had not taught any Dharma? What issue did he actually raise? He was stating, "Even at my level of Tathagata, I’ve seen neither the ultimate truth of the universe nor what the ultimate Dharma is." Thus, he asked people later on not to take his words as the absolute or the unchangeable truth. Otherwise, it would later limit people at or below the Tathagata level, and they would be unable to make breakthroughs toward high levels. Later, people could not understand the actual meaning of this sentence and thought that if taught, Dharma is not Dharma—they have understood it this way. In fact, Sakyamuni was saying that there are different Dharma at different levels, and that the Dharma at each level is not the absolute truth of the universe. Yet the Dharma at a given level assumes a guiding role at that level. Actually, he was telling such a principle.

In the past, many people, especially those from Zen Buddhism, held such prejudice and an extremely warped view. How do you practice and cultivate yourself without being taught and guided? There are many Buddhist stories in Buddhism. Some people may have read about a person who went to heaven. Upon arriving in heaven, he discovered that every word in the Diamond Sutra12 up there was different from that down here, and the meaning was entirely different. How could this Diamond Sutra be different from that in the ordinary human world? There are also people who claim: "The scripture in the Paradise of Ultimate Bliss is totally different from that down here, and it’s not at all the same thing. Not only are the words different, but the implications and the meaning are all different, as they’ve changed." As a matter of fact, this is because the same Fa has different transformations and forms of manifestation at different levels, and it can play different guiding roles for practitioners at different levels.

It is known that in Buddhism there is a booklet called A Tour to the Paradise of Ultimate Bliss. It states that while a monk was sitting in meditation, his Primordial Spirit13 (yuanshen) went to the Paradise of Ultimate Bliss and saw its scenery. He spent one day there; when he returned to the human world, six years had passed. Did he see it? He did, but what he saw was not its true state. Why? It is because his level was not high enough, and what he was shown was only the manifestation of the Buddha Fa at his level. Because a paradise like that is a manifestation of the Fa’s composition, he could not see its actual situation. This is what it means when I talk about "No Dharma is definitive."
---

Det männsikor får är bestätteelse - New Age är till för det - vem kan hitta en genuin Mästare därute, eller på ett inre plan, som kan gudia en högre - skydda en, för det är grunden, vill man kultivera så är man hotad, fordringsägarna låter en inte bara "sticka" - därför var det ofta så förr att en Mästare bara tog en elev/lärjunge- det var allt han kunde skydda med sina förmågor/gong. Man kan inte heller kultivera uppåt och ur samsara... det ärocksåså att det är Mästaren som omvandlar en dygd/karma till gong - så är det alltid, ingen kan själv få gong, utan det görs av Mästaren. Du vet kanske att de som i Kina/Indien och på andra håll begav sig ut i skogarna, beregen och till grottor för att kultivera fortfarande ärhär, de kan vara många hundra år, de kommer inte vidare - för samsara kan man inte ta sig ut ifrån. Det är också så att de kultiverar främst sitt sekundära medvetande, inte sitt huvudmedvetande - därförfinns det mycket det där med att bedöva sig, berusa sig - inom taoistiska riktningar så kunde munkar supa sig fulla, de ville "döva" ned sitt vanliga medvetande, för det var deras andra medvetande som fe kultiverade och fick gong - så därförär det allt det där med trans, vara omedvetna osv - de har inte kultiverat sig själva kan man säga.

New Age-domisktjosan - där är det bara "annat" som kommer in, precis som det är inom voodo - det syns ju... alla naturdyrkan/religioner, shamanism, dyrka andar och jorden osv osv - det är det som man får in av besättelser som talar igenom personerna...det är denna besättelse som har förmågor osv - det är sorgligt - personen har gett upp sig själv och sin kropp - tar inte upp alien nu...

Så är det oavsett om man säger man kommer från ett tempel, är zenbuddist eller vilket "trams" som helst. Jag har länge sagt att detvar vad som skedde med David Icke - han gav upp sitt liv , förstörde sitt energisystem och blev besatt. Någon postade ganska nyss en länk, läste ni som inte fattat grundbultar utan endast vågar vara naiva... (karman/bestättelsen rules...) den texten... som bekräftar just det jag sagt. Icke äri nte längre Icke.

Novax pekat mot månen men sätter tummen i munnen. Har han devolverat?

Quote:

Så solklart... - Se micros tråd ... http://www.vaken.se/modules/newbb/vie ... t_id=40413#forumpost40413

vojne och kul - kursen är visst grymt bra...

Ge mig en ledtråd om vad du inte förstår, eller menar - så ska jag försöka att ta det på en annan lägstanivå - där jag kan tänka mig att du kan befinna dig utifrån ditt "utlägg" ovan.

Jag skulle bara busa lite med dig novax. ;)

Jag ser dock inte meningen i att du försöker beskriva dina idéer för mig, jag tror att jag förståt var du kommer ifrån. Men det går inte i linje med min förståelse utan åt helt andra håll.

Hare..